
Clarifying user request
I need to respond to the user's message about a rumor regarding a club's disbandment and unpaid wages. Since they’re sharing news in Chinese, they might want a summary, source verification, or context. I should ask a clarifying question if I’m not sure about their intentions. I notice I should avoid external lookups unless necessary and instead maintain concision while ensuring safety against misinformation. A simple clarification might be, “Do you want me to verify, summarize, or draft a post?”Considering verification steps
I shouldn’t claim anything is fact without verification. I can suggest steps for confirming the information, such as checking authoritative sources, the official club account, or league announcements regarding wages. It’s important to phrase my response neutrally and mention my knowledge cutoff. I could offer to draft a short news brief or a Weibo post, and I should also consider providing a three-sentence summary with verification steps in Chinese.
I could say: "国安内部人士否认传闻,对解散和欠薪的说法不实,球队运转正常。” Additionally, I might advise on how to identify rumors, but I need to be careful to avoid presenting unverified claims as facts.Planning response options
I want to keep my response minimal and friendly. I’ll ask how I can help, offering 2-3 options like verifying information, creating a news brief, or drafting a Weibo post, along with some additional context about topics like league regulations or salary policies.
I’ll respond in Chinese, providing a succinct news draft and a Weibo message of 50-80 words. To ensure safety, I'll include a disclaimer stating, "以官方通报为准," and a checklist for verification steps, like checking official announcements and mainstream media reports. Let's finalize this!
你是想让我核实这条消息,还是需要把它改写成快讯/微博文案?我都可以帮你处理。
先给你两版即用:
快讯稿(新闻口吻) 北京国安内部人士回应网传“俱乐部将解散、欠薪8个月”称均为不实信息,俱乐部运转正常。关于相关传闻,请以俱乐部官方通报为准。
微博文案(精简版) 国安内部人士回应:不存在“解散”也无“欠薪8个月”,传闻不实,俱乐部运转正常。具体以官方消息为准。


如果你想让我顺带核实来源,我可以查下俱乐部官微/中超公司/足协及主流媒体报道并给出链接与时间线。需要的话回复“核实”。
